<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snowblower Help &#8211; Which Type?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry B</title>
		<link>http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type/comment-page-1#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type#comment-851</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t buy a 2 stage if the average snow was 2&quot;.  That&#039;s throwing too much weight around.  If you really get an average of 5 to 6&quot; consistently, the two stage might be the way to go.  There are a couple of drawbacks: 

1- You have a small space.  Most two stages tend to be bigger in my area.  You could have a mobility problem.  If the drive is steep, a two stage, which is probably self propelled, is still going to be hard to control going down and could slide going up.  

2-Most of the two stages I&#039;ve seen have steel augers.  There is a potential for cutttng the asphalt.  Most single stages have blades edged with rubber.  They don&#039;t completely scrape the surface but then it also doesn&#039;t scape the surface.  You can finish it off with a thin app of sodium chloride (rock salt) which, if properly applied, doesn&#039;t damage seasoned asphalt.

3- When you use a two stage, you are usually throwing a lot of weight around.  When I was doing commercial snow removal, we only used two stage blowers for long, straight walkways.  We found the manuverability of a single stage more valuable than the weight and power of a two stage.  If you have that small of an area to do, a second run during a 6&quot; fall wouldn&#039;t seem that big of a deal.  

4- Although the money isn&#039;t a main consideration, why overspend on something you are going to use about 6 to 8 times a year?  

5- If you get a 2 stage blower, it&#039;s going to a lot heavier in 20 yrs. And if someone with a build slighter than yours is going to use it, they would probably prefer the single stage.

In short, I&#039;d get a single stage with a motor in the higher hp range to compensate for increased depth. (4.5 hp)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t buy a 2 stage if the average snow was 2&quot;.  That&#8217;s throwing too much weight around.  If you really get an average of 5 to 6&quot; consistently, the two stage might be the way to go.  There are a couple of drawbacks: </p>
<p>1- You have a small space.  Most two stages tend to be bigger in my area.  You could have a mobility problem.  If the drive is steep, a two stage, which is probably self propelled, is still going to be hard to control going down and could slide going up.  </p>
<p>2-Most of the two stages I&#8217;ve seen have steel augers.  There is a potential for cutttng the asphalt.  Most single stages have blades edged with rubber.  They don&#8217;t completely scrape the surface but then it also doesn&#8217;t scape the surface.  You can finish it off with a thin app of sodium chloride (rock salt) which, if properly applied, doesn&#8217;t damage seasoned asphalt.</p>
<p>3- When you use a two stage, you are usually throwing a lot of weight around.  When I was doing commercial snow removal, we only used two stage blowers for long, straight walkways.  We found the manuverability of a single stage more valuable than the weight and power of a two stage.  If you have that small of an area to do, a second run during a 6&quot; fall wouldn&#8217;t seem that big of a deal.  </p>
<p>4- Although the money isn&#8217;t a main consideration, why overspend on something you are going to use about 6 to 8 times a year?  </p>
<p>5- If you get a 2 stage blower, it&#8217;s going to a lot heavier in 20 yrs. And if someone with a build slighter than yours is going to use it, they would probably prefer the single stage.</p>
<p>In short, I&#8217;d get a single stage with a motor in the higher hp range to compensate for increased depth. (4.5 hp)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawnboy</title>
		<link>http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type/comment-page-1#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawnboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowblowerexpress.com/snowblower-help-which-type#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Boston city, as in Boston, MA?  If so, we get similar snow, as I live in Franklin, MA.

Both will do equally well in fluffy snow.  However, if you get very wet snow, like the last storm, the one-stage machines cannot handle it.  They clog with slush.  So, get the bigger machine.  They&#039;re self-propelled, or at least yours should be for that slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boston city, as in Boston, MA?  If so, we get similar snow, as I live in Franklin, MA.</p>
<p>Both will do equally well in fluffy snow.  However, if you get very wet snow, like the last storm, the one-stage machines cannot handle it.  They clog with slush.  So, get the bigger machine.  They&#8217;re self-propelled, or at least yours should be for that slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.snowblowerexpress.com @ 2012-02-07 14:47:46 -->
